AI SEO Services

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Getting your company named in the answers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude write when a buyer asks who to hire. This is the bulk of the work and most of it happens off your own site, on the pages those models already read.

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)

Getting your content into direct answers rather than a list of links. Google AI Overviews, featured snippets and voice results. The unit here is a single passage that answers one question completely, so it can be lifted without the rest of the page.

LLM Optimization

Making your site readable by the models in the first place. Crawler access, clean structure, entity clarity, and pages that render their content in the HTML rather than after JavaScript runs. Several AI crawlers do not run JavaScript, so a page can be live and still invisible.

1. Sourced Prompt Discovery

The problem: I cannot tell where we stand. Every time I check I get a different answer.

We find the exact questions your buyers ask AI, pulled from the forums, review sites and sales conversations where they actually asked them. Long specific questions with budgets and constraints in them, not five-word keywords. Every question carries its source.

Then we run every one of them many times, in fresh sessions, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, and record the result as a ratio. Asked five times, your competitor appeared in five, you in none. Never a single screenshot. Re-run identically every week.

What you hold: your position. Every buying question, and where you stand on each. Named, cited or absent, and who was named instead.

2. Citation Gap Analysis

The problem: I do not know what actually moves it. I have tried things and nothing happened.

Every run logs every source the model cited. We tally them by site and by exact page, across every question, and rank them by how often they decide the answer. That list is kept current, because sources drop out with no notification.

Then we work out why those pages win and yours does not. Published numbers instead of contact us for case studies. A named author with a real bio. A directory profile you never filled in. A forum answer nobody on your side wrote. Then we check your own site the way the crawler reads it.

What you hold: your gaps. The sources that decide your category, and for every question you are losing, the specific reason the winning page beats yours.

3. Source Engineering

Getting you onto the pages the AI already trusts, in a form it will repeat.

The problem: the pages that decide it are not mine, and I cannot get to them.

We split the work between what belongs on your site and what has to live on someone else's, the directories, lists and forums the answers are built from. If your domain is not already being read for a question, we do not publish there and wait. That piece goes where the AI already looks.

We write it so it can be lifted as a recommendation rather than read as information. A clear verdict on who you are right for, real numbers, a named person behind it. Then we place it and re-run your questions to check it is being used. If it is not picked up within a run cycle, it moves.

What you hold: your placements. The pages you are now on that you were not before, each tied to the question it was meant to win.

We sell this and nothing else

All seven of the agencies Google currently names for this search sell traditional SEO alongside AI SEO. Some have been SEO firms for twenty years. We do not run an SEO retainer and will not sell you one.

You get the question list

Every buying question we run is yours to see and to run yourself. If your number and our number disagree, you will find out before we do. Most of this market asks you to trust a dashboard instead.

We publish our own research, including the parts that look bad

We put geocited.io live on 19 July 2026. Everything below happened inside the first six weeks of the domain existing.

Six weeks after launch we published one research article on a domain with 7 referring domains and no indexed blog articles. Google crawled it 90 minutes after we requested indexing, ranked it first for its target query the next morning above HubSpot and Neil Patel, and pulled it into the AI Overview source pool the same day.

That article was 40 buying-intent prompts across eight B2B SaaS categories run in ChatGPT and Google, with all 490 cited URLs classified by page type and owner. Comparison pages took 56.7% of citations on head-to-head questions, pricing pages 53.4% on cost questions, listicles 30.0% on category questions. The raw JSON, the classified CSV and the classifier script are published with it.

In the same week we ran our own brand through ChatGPT 18 times, across eight phrasings of the same question. It named us in 4. On one phrasing we appeared in 4 runs out of 7 and always came first. Reorder the same words and we appeared in 0 out of 5.

And we published a client audit that found the opposite problem. Zakro, a factory operations platform, was cited on both questions that used its name and on none of the eight that described the problem instead.

None of the ten pages Google currently cites for this search publishes any research of its own.

We publish the price

Two of those ten publish a price anywhere on the page. Ours is on the pricing page, in full, including what each tier is not for.

The guarantee names a number, a date and a consequence

If your tracked Share of Answer has not moved by day 90, month three is free. You can cancel inside the first 30 days and keep the audit, the question list and everything built.

One of those ten pages carries a guarantee at all. It names no metric, no deadline and no consequence.